Assisted development workflow
From issue to pull request with an upfront specification, tests and automated review.
$ workflow run --issue 412
→ reading repository context
→ specification generated · awaiting review
✓ approved by @pablo
→ implementing · 6 files · 14 tests
✓ pull request #418 ready for review
The problem
Coding assistants speed up writing, but not review. Without a shared practice, a team ends up with more code than it can review.
How it is built
- A specification generated from the issue and approved by a person.
- Generation guided by that specification, not by whatever prompt comes to mind.
- Mandatory automated tests over generated code.
- Review focused on design rather than style.
- Cycle time and rework metrics.
Technologies
Build time
Continuously evolving
Want it with your data?
This demo becomes a pilot connected to your systems in about four weeks.
Ask for this pilotWhat was verified at the end
Specification before code
As a systematic practice.
Review with judgement
The team discusses design, not formatting.
Traceability
From issue to PR with the full context.
Related situation
Other cases
Shall we talk about your case?
Tell me which process takes the most time. In half an hour I will tell you whether AI solves it, how I would approach it and what it would take.